I've given away content on this board for free for years but unfortunately those days are at an end. So, I suppose I have to have a say since I'm a
"vendor" now.
You're right mouse, C4S is being unreasonable about what ads they allow on their site. But I find this form of 'business retaliation' equally unreasonable.
I also have a problem with you referring to this as a 'spam' issue. This issue has a lot more to do with competition for ad revenue then spam. You can't just throw a word like spam around out of context like that. First of all, its technically inaccurate to describe what most vendors are trying to do. This has little to do with vendors "spamming" and has more to do with a dispute between the mousepad and C4S. Secondly, words with negative connotations like 'spam' are not very flattering to consumers. By associating the word 'spam' with vendors you're giving their business an unflattering image to consumers and possibly hurting their businesses even more.
You're right mouse, C4S is being unreasonable about what ads they allow on their site. But I find this form of 'business retaliation' equally unreasonable.
I also have a problem with you referring to this as a 'spam' issue. This issue has a lot more to do with competition for ad revenue then spam. You can't just throw a word like spam around out of context like that. First of all, its technically inaccurate to describe what most vendors are trying to do. This has little to do with vendors "spamming" and has more to do with a dispute between the mousepad and C4S. Secondly, words with negative connotations like 'spam' are not very flattering to consumers. By associating the word 'spam' with vendors you're giving their business an unflattering image to consumers and possibly hurting their businesses even more.




