I've been meaning to do this review for a while but have been hesitant because I know the webmaster has given many great samples to The Pad. However,
I'll go ahead and give a quickie to help out anyone thinking about joining.
Pros:
1. Lisa - Drool. Lots of her. Which is great for me because that's the reason I joined.
2. Cheap - $15 bucks. What more could you ask for?
3. Amateur girls - I don't know about you, but I'm kinda sick of the porn girls and enjoy looking at girls next door.
4. Good lighting - A lot of the shoots are done outside which gives a great combination of lighting and color saturation, thanks to the grass and trees.
Cons:
1. Resolution - I'll admit it, I'm a resolution whore. My Dell is 2560x1600 and I enjoy huge resolution pictures, like that of California Beach Feet. The FoN pictures are, well, lacking. All of the pictures are 1024x768 resolution and the webmaster explained that it was the automated uploading process that BHE has which resizes all your photos. Well, I'm glad I know that now, because I'll never join a BHE site ever since 1024x768 resolution is so 1990s. I think this is the first time in history that I have saved zero pictures from a paysite only because it was too low of res.
2. Equipment - Although some shots came out great, you can tell that the camera gear is lacking somewhat. The videos are indeed, not up to par in the quality department and some of the photos come out blurry and or pixelated in low light situations (indoor). I guess I'm an equipment whore too as I shoot a Canon 5D.
3. Updates - In my month that I joined, there was a stint where there were no updates for 10+ days. Perhaps the updates have picked up but during my term,
they were far and few.
4. Zips - BHE's bustipated pages do not have any zip files. And to further add insult to injury, you can't right click on a picture and do "save link as" because every picture is a fricking HTML file that is a popup with the picture in it. You see 100 and want them all? Yep, click 100 times, right click 100 times and save-as, and close 100 popup windows.
Pros:
1. Lisa - Drool. Lots of her. Which is great for me because that's the reason I joined.
2. Cheap - $15 bucks. What more could you ask for?
3. Amateur girls - I don't know about you, but I'm kinda sick of the porn girls and enjoy looking at girls next door.
4. Good lighting - A lot of the shoots are done outside which gives a great combination of lighting and color saturation, thanks to the grass and trees.
Cons:
1. Resolution - I'll admit it, I'm a resolution whore. My Dell is 2560x1600 and I enjoy huge resolution pictures, like that of California Beach Feet. The FoN pictures are, well, lacking. All of the pictures are 1024x768 resolution and the webmaster explained that it was the automated uploading process that BHE has which resizes all your photos. Well, I'm glad I know that now, because I'll never join a BHE site ever since 1024x768 resolution is so 1990s. I think this is the first time in history that I have saved zero pictures from a paysite only because it was too low of res.
2. Equipment - Although some shots came out great, you can tell that the camera gear is lacking somewhat. The videos are indeed, not up to par in the quality department and some of the photos come out blurry and or pixelated in low light situations (indoor). I guess I'm an equipment whore too as I shoot a Canon 5D.
3. Updates - In my month that I joined, there was a stint where there were no updates for 10+ days.
Perhaps the updates have picked up but during my term,
they were far and few.
4. Zips - BHE's bustipated pages do not have any zip files. And to further add insult to injury, you can't right click on a picture and do "save link as" because every picture is a fricking HTML file that is a popup with the picture in it. You see 100 and want them all? Yep, click 100 times, right click 100 times and save-as, and close 100 popup windows.
Anyway, I dont think that is a right about the auto BHE uploader - or else other
webmasters have gotten around it. Im positive some sites have 2000x pixel pics. 2) Equipment - if indeed the pixels are 1024x768 because of equipment, then its
no surprise, really. As for vids, I almost prefer slightly smaller vids - the 200 and 300 mgb vids from calibeachfeet seem like overkill at times. 3) Updates -
if you're running an amateur site I can see how this would be a problem. I guess in a perfect world you would always try to keep 10 photoshoots ahead of
what you've posted so that you never run out of content (rainy/cold season?) but who knows. maybe the webmaster was just on holidays for a week. 4) Zips -
yeah, zips are a nice feature - although not that many sites offer them. Thanks again for the very thorough review! 
